Dear Friends, SBI Clerk 2018 Notification has been released we hope you all have started your preparation. Here we have started New Series of Practice Materials specially for SBI Clerk 2018. Aspirants those who are preparing for the exams can use this “20-20” English Questions.
[WpProQuiz 1375]
Click “Start Quiz” to attend these Questions and view Explanation
Daily Practice Test Schedule | Good Luck
Topic | Daily Publishing Time |
Daily News Papers & Editorials | 8.00 AM |
Current Affairs Quiz | 9.00 AM |
Logical Reasoning | 10.00 AM |
Quantitative Aptitude “20-20” | 11.00 AM |
Vocabulary (Based on The Hindu) | 12.00 PM |
Static GK Quiz | 1.00 PM |
English Language “20-20” | 2.00 PM |
Banking Awareness Quiz | 3.00 PM |
Reasoning Puzzles & Seating | 4.00 PM |
Daily Current Affairs Updates | 5.00 PM |
Data Interpretation / Application Sums (Topic Wise) | 6.00 PM |
Reasoning Ability “20-20” | 7.00 PM |
English Language (New Pattern Questions) | 8.00 PM |
General / Financial Awareness Quiz | 9.00 PM |
Directions (Q. 1-10): Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below it.
To appreciate the challenge that India faces in generating adequate employment over the next three decades, it is useful to examine two scenarios for the worker population ratio (WPR), which is the ratio of workers to the population of men and women. In the first scenario, the WPR remains fixed at the rate estimated by the National Sample Survey in 2011-12 through 2040. In the second scenario, after 2015, the male WPR rises by 2.5% every five years, while the female WPR increases by 5% (due to the much lower current female WPR). Multiplying the WPR by the relevant population statistics gives a reasonable estimate of the number of men and women who might be in the job market up to 2040. The situation looks grim even if the WPR remains fixed. An additional 30 million jobs will need to be created between 2010 and 2015—which will not happen given the depressed economy and that only 2.7 million extra jobs were added between 2004-05 and 2009-10. As it stands today, India has neither the growth nor the required institutional flexibility to create 6 million extra jobs per year up to 2015 and over 5 million per year from 2015 to 2025. Things get worse under the second scenario, which incorporates the more realistic assumption that, armed with a better education, the percentage of men and women joining the labor force will be higher. Under this setting, India will need to find 44 million additional jobs between 2015 and 2020 at an annual rate of a little less than 9 million. These numbers are not exact, but they underscore the urgent need to create much wider employment in the coming years. There are those who believe that India can never hope to achieve significantly higher employment without the freedom to fire. However, India has reasonable labor market flexibility. The vast unorganized sector, which accounts for more than 90% of India’s approximately 470 million workers, has no entry or exit barriers. Moreover, the legal constraints that allegedly prevent extra hiring in the organized sector—such as sections 25(N) and 25(O) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, or provisions of the Contract Labor (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970—are often overstated. No doubt creating legal flexibility can help. But the barriers to employment growth lie in an environment that is increasingly cramping the country’s growth potential. For example the telecom industry. On 2 February 2012, the Supreme Court of India cancelled 122 mobile telecom licenses allegedly on account of rigging to generate below-market prices. Since then, it has been virtually impossible for the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and the department of telecommunications to allot additional permits and spectrum. An employment-intensive sector, the slowdown has reduced its growth and its potential for creating additional jobs. There’s a long list of sectors with high employment elasticity that have slowed on account of lower growth as well as judiciary and regulatory overreach.
1).Why does the author lay emphasis on employment opportunity?
2). What, according to the author, is/are the factors responsible for employment creation?
3). Which of the following is an adverse impact of unemployment? Select the most appropriate option in the context of the given passage?
4).Which of the following is possibly the most appropriate title for the passage?
5).Which of the following statement is definitely true as given in the passage?
Directions (Q. 6-8): Choose the word which is MOST OPPOSITE in meaning of the word printed in bold as used in the passage
6). Grim
7). Cramping
8). Elasticity
Directions (Q. 9–10): Choose the word which is MOST SIMILAR in meaning of the word printed in bold as used in the passage
9). Allegedly
10). Incorporate
Directions (Q. 11-15): Read each sentence to find out whether there is any grammatical or idiomatic error in it. The error any, will be in one part of the sentence. The number of that part is the answer. If there is no error, the answer is (e).
Directions (Q. 16 – 20): In given sentences phrase is represented in bold which may be incorrect so you have to find the correct phrase in place of that if the phrase is correct in the given sentences than mark no correction required as your answer.
A) Promising
B) Promises
C) Promised
A) Entered
B) Enters
C) entering
A) Turning up
B) Turns up
C) Turned up
A) Inspite on the one hand
B) For on the one hand
C) While on the one hand
A) could potentially dispossess
B) Will dispossess potentially
C) Have dispossessed potentially
Answers:
Directions (Q. 1-10):
1).Answer: c
2). Answer: a
3). Answer: d
4). Answer: c
5). Answer: e
6). Answer: b
7). Answer: d
8). Answer: e
9). Answer: a
10). Answer: c
Directions (Q. 11-15):
‘On’ will be used in place of ‘over’.
According to tense of sentence ‘be’ will be used after to.
Sentence is in present tense so first form of verb will be used.
Revised will be used in place of revise.
Government is in singular form so has will be used in place of have.
Directions (Q. 16 – 20):
The correct answer will be ‘promises’ because the clause is in present simple tense and noun ‘statement’ is singular.
The bill proposed that means it will be forever, so ‘entering’ will be correct as participle.
‘turning up’ is a complete phrase and ‘turning’ is used as present participle.
The correct phrase is ‘while on the one hand’ because while is used with subject and verb, and coordinates with also to form a pair or two events.
The correct phrase will be ‘could potentially dispossess’ because ‘could’ denotes the possibility, which is true in this context and adverb is always used before verb.
This post was last modified on September 16, 2020 12:00 pm